The first ethical guideline of psychology basically states “do no harm.” This means that psychologists should strive to benefit those who are engaged in their experiments or at least make sure that they do not have any negative, long-term effects. I like this rule because it seems like the intentions are good. However, I do think that it is going to inhibit the advancement of psychological research which could benefit the world.
The second guideline are the values of fidelity and responsibility. This is pretty much the importance of accountability between psychologists, subjects, and other professionals of different fields. They are required to makes sure that their colleagues do not abuse the power that a psychologist has. I again think this rule has great intentions. It is about trying to make sure all humans are equal in the eyes of the world. However, I worry that it is going to start making some psychologists do “underground” studies away from other people who could help.
The third guideline is the importance of upholding the principle of integrity. Psychologists are to be honest and accurate in their studies and with their patients. This guideline seems to be the one that I have the fewest qualms with. I do not see any negative side effects of telling the truth. There is also a caveat that says a psychologist may deny the truth if the truth would cause harm. This ethical guideline seems perfect.
The fourth guideline pretty much says that the knowledge gained through psychological studies is free use for those who would like to use it. A psychologist cannot hide what they have learned good or bad. I think this is a great rule if you assume that we are alone in the universe. However, if there were a form of intelligent life out there that was hostile towards humans. They would have access to everything that could be used to potentially manipulate us. I realize that this is a ridiculous situation. I just thought that it should be mentioned.
The fifth and final guideline tells psychologists to respect people’s rights and dignity. This covers a wide range of topics. From privacy and confidentiality to gender and race bias. It is an overarching rule that basically means, “be good.” Although I think this rule is perhaps the most pure, it is extremely vague. Perhaps it could use some rewording to increase its accuracy.
I believe that these ethical principles all come from a pure intention. I think that they are a great attempt at self regulation, and they are definitely “good enough.” However, a group of psychologists should be able to come up with a more accurate list. There is not any rush to change it, but it could be better. There is no doubt that the majourity of psychologists follow these rules and the public believes that for the most part. Yet there will always be people who believe they know better and ignore the standards that their colleagues put in place.
C.F.
Works Cited
Effective Date June 1, 2010. Copyright © 2010 American Psychological Association. All Rights Reserved. The 1992 Ethics Code was Not Effective as of June 1, 2003. "Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct." Http://www.apa.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 20 Oct. 2016. <http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/>.
No comments:
Post a Comment